Private Prison Reform in Oklahoma
Rather than rewarding rehabilitation and success, Oklahoma’s guaranteed minimum occupancy payments to private prison operators incentivize cutting corners and warehousing inmates at the lowest possible cost.
This means if a group of corrections professionals starts a new business to challenge the legacy operators, Oklahoma law forbids the state from even considering their proposal. This makes it effectively impossible for new operators to enter the market, stifling competition.
It’s time to introduce accountability for private prisons through competition and contract reform.
THE SOLUTION
Performance-based contracts pay operators more if inmates recidivate less and become employed. Oklahoma should rebid all contracts to be based on performance, aligning contract incentives with the success of the state correctional system.
Oklahoma must also repeal the demonstrated history requirement and allow competitive start-ups to challenge legacy companies.
WHY IT MATTERS
Basing contract terms on measurable outcomes would refocus criminal justice on effective rehabilitation, which would set incarcerated individuals up for success and improve community safety.
THE BOTTOM LINE:
Oklahoma’s private prison operators need more competition and accountability to better serve the people of the Sooner State.
Oklahoma should:
- Repeal anti-competitive laws in private prison contracts and let the market work.
- Hold prisons accountable by introducing performance-based contracts that pay private prison operators based on the results they achieve.
Stay Informed
Sign up to receive updates about our fight for policies at the state level that restore liberty, accountability, and innovation in American governance.