Expanding Private Prison Competition

Starting in 1983, the private prison industry was advertised as a way for governments to operate prisons more affordably and efficiently. However, over time, the practice has become one of the most controversial aspects of government privatization.

Private prisons are often incentivized to keep their beds full to maximize shareholder profits, creating a perverse incentive to hold low-level offenders for more extended periods.

Lack of proper funding and rehabilitation programs, combined with a dangerous environment, makes life difficult for staff, resulting in high levels of burnout and turnover.

A monopoly on the industry has culminated in three leading private prison corporations dominating the landscape and lobbying to block competition for government contracts.

Expanding competition for private prison contracts would incentivize success by encouraging innovative, outcomes-based rehabilitation programs and give states a choice in service providers.

Communities deserve better than the status quo when it comes to reducing crime.

Tying a portion of private prison funding to positive, measurable outcomes would give inmates a better chance at rebuilding their lives and improving public safety.